Consider the relationship between language, form and content, writing practices and reception affected by temporal and spatial frameworks, with reference to intercultural contexts and ‘national’ literature.

Entered topic is not the final assessment title nor argument! I have failed this assessment so I need to resubmit it. And these are the only guidelines we were given:”Your essay must: 1) Have a transregional component. This can mean a comparative approach based on two or more countries (which are Japan, China, Korea), or it could mean a focus on one country but with reference to one or more other countries, or with a general introduction followed by a main argument focusing on one country.2) Have a clear research question and a clear structure, with introduction, argument and conclusion.3) Include references using one of the recognised citation styles and a separate bibliography. Footnotes or in-text citations are included in the word count but the bibliography is not. You can go up to 10% over the word limit without penalty. Your essay can:1) Take the form of a conventional essay on a particular issue, with reference to relevant primary or secondary sources2) Take the form of a review essay on a single book or a number of books and articles on a specific topic” Below I will include materials from that class for a guidance: Summary: In this lecture, Dr Grace Koh will present key developments in East Asian literary traditions, with a view to identify and discuss varying conceptions of ‘literature’ and the ‘literary’ in different historical and cultural contexts. Consider the relationship between language, form and content, writing practices and reception affected by temporal and spatial frameworks, with reference to intercultural contexts and ‘national’ literature. Essential reading (Attached below): Denecke, Wiebke, with Nam Nguyen. “Shared Literary Heritage in the East Asian Sinographic Sphere.” In Wiebke Denecke, Wai-Yee Li, and Xiaofei Tian, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Classical Chinese Literature (1000 BCE-900 BCE). New York: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 510-532. Further reading: Denecke, Wiebke, Wai-Yee Li, and Xiaofei Tian, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Classical Chinese Literature (1000 BCE-900 BCE). New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. (Section Five, pp. 471-578)Heidegger, Martin. “A Dialogue on Language: between a Japanese and an Inquirer.” In On the Way to Language. Trans. Peter D. Hertz. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc., 1971, pp. 1-54.Ko, Dorothy, JaHyun Kim Haboush, and Joan R. Piggott, eds. Women and Confucian Cultures of Premodern China, Korea, and Japan. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2003.Lee, Peter H., trans. and intro. A Korean Storyteller’s Miscellany: The P’aegwan chapki of Ŏ Sukkwŏn. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.Mostow, Joshua, ed. The Columbia Companion to Modern East Asian Literature. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.Marra, Michael. Essays on Japan: Between Aesthetics and Literature. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Owen, Stephen. Readings in Chinese Literary Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.Rutt, Richard. “Traditional Korean Poetry Criticism: Fifty Sihwa.” Transactions of the Korea Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 47 (1972): 105-43.Tezuka Tomio. “An Hour with Heidegger.” In May, Reinhard. Heidegger’s Hidden Sources: East Asian Influences on his Work. Trans. Graham Parkes. London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 59-64.Thornber, Karen Laura. Empire of Texts in Motion: Chinese, Korean and Taiwanese Transculturations of Japanese Literature. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center, 2009.

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Get Help Now!

The post onsider the relationship between language, form and content, writing practices and reception affected by temporal and spatial frameworks, with reference to intercultural contexts and ‘national’ literature. appeared first on .