FDTC Comparison of African Americans And Asian Americans Comparative Essay Take-home Essay Due 4/26/2020 at 11 p.m. Write on one of the following question

FDTC Comparison of African Americans And Asian Americans Comparative Essay Take-home Essay Due 4/26/2020 at 11 p.m.

Write on one of the following questions:

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Compare and contrast the experiences of any two of the following groups: African Americans during the Jim Crow era (1877-1970), Mexican Americans between 1848 and 1970, Asian Americans between 1849 and 1945, and Native Americans between 1890 and 1970. How were their lives and struggles similar? How were they different? How did racism affect their live

As you write your essay keep the following points in mind. You should have a clear thesis statement that answers the question you are writing about. You should support your answer with abundant and specific examples. You may use brief quotations, if they are properly cited, but not more than about 5% of your paper should be quoted material. Do not copy or closely paraphrase the words of any other person without attribution. Unattributed copying constitutes plagiarism and is grounds for a zero grade on the paper and possibly further sanctions under the universitys Academic Dishonesty Policy. Your paper should be about 6-8 pages in length, double-spaced, with one-inch margins. I prefer Chicago or Turabian style notes, but will accept APA or MLA citations. You should draw your examples from the textbooks and online readings for the course. You may also draw on other scholarly sources such as peer-reviewed journals and monographs from scholarly presses. Wikipedia, The History Channel and similar online sources are not acceptable source Scioto Main/West Side Relief Sewer Rehabilitation
Risk Analysis Data Summary Table
Economic
Sum
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
2
2
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
6
1
1
3
3
2
3
6
6
4
4
1
3
5
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
1,502
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
–
5
5
–
–
5
–
5
5
5
5
–
–
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
–
–
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
5
5
3
3
3
2
1
1
3
1
1
3
4
3
4
3
3
1
1
1
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
1
1
4
5
5
5
5
5
3
4
3
3
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
4
4
1
5
5
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
3
3
1
1
–
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
29
32
36
40
38
41
39
39
39
39
39
39
42
31
40
34
29
33
33
29
20
19
32
19
19
44
45
38
39
31
31
17
21
25
23
26
25
25
25
25
25
25
27
17
25
19
16
20
20
17
14
13
19
13
13
31
31
25
25
18
18
0045S0005:0022S0021
0022S0021:0022S0020
0022S0020:0022S0035
0022S0035:0022S0156
0022S0156:0022S0168
0022S0168:0022S0170
0022S0170:0022S0184
0022S0184:0022S0284
0022S0284:0022S0285
0022S0285:0022S0286
0022S0286:0022S0288
0022S0288:0022S0360
0022S0360:0022S0359
0022S0359:0022S0358
0022S0358:0022S0355
0022S0355:0022S0353
0022S0353:0022S0354
0022S0354:0007S0013
0007S0013:0007S0018a
0007S0013:0007S0018b
0007S0018:0007S0076
0007S0076:0007S0075
0007S0075:0007S0065
0007S0065:0007S0062
0007S0062:0007S0061
0007S0061:0007S0059
0007S0059:0007S0057
0007S0057:0020S0040
0020S0040:0020S0035
0020S0035:0020S0032
0020S0032:0020S0029
0020S0029:0019S0017
0019S0017:0019S0013
0019S0013:0019S0010
0019S0010:0019S0006
0019S0006:0019S0003
0019S0003:0019S0001
0019S0001:0040S0344
263.9
504.5
496.1
509.2
393.5
398.6
399.5
398.8
307.6
165.3
355.2
371.7
85.5
73.5
325.0
70.0
40.0
316.6
405.6
112.0
592.3
576.2
460.2
508.0
464.5
526.4
604.5
504.3
393.5
499.7
535.8
536.3
473.8
589.9
500.3
492.1
503.8
95.2
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
42
42
42
42
42
36
36
36
36
36
36
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
1935
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
CIP w Clay
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.7
2.2
2.5
2.8
3.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.5
1.0
1.0
2.0
4.0
1.0
2.5
2.3
2.3
1.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.5
4.0
1.0
4.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
4
1
1
1
0
1
3
3
1
3
3
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
737
737
737
737
737
737
737
737
633
633
633
633
633
531
531
531
531
531
531
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1,277
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
–
–
–
5
–
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
–
–
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
–
–
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
5
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
2
2
1
2
1
1
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
1
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
1
1
1
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
3
3
3
1
1
3
–
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
37
37
37
37
37
37
38
36
36
42
42
38
41
41
41
41
41
40
42
42
42
42
35
38
26
28
16
27
16
16
42
41
36
35
37
30
28
30
22
22
22
22
22
23
21
21
27
27
23
26
26
26
26
26
25
27
27
27
27
20
25
14
16
10
16
10
10
28
27
22
22
22
17
15
17
SO
Frequency
?Overall Replace ($/LF)
Under a
Building
Railroad
Under
Railroad
Tracks
Highway
Under a
Highway
Arterial Road /
Large Vehicle
Traffic
Depth
Residential
Street /
Parking Lot
WIB
Frequency
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.2
2.2
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
O&M
DSR
Frequency
1.0
3.0
4.0
2.0
2.0
3.0
3.5
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
3.3
1.0
2.0
2.1
3.5
2.0
1.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
Service
Land Use
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Structural
Property
Damage
Potential
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
CIP
MOC
Located
within or
near a
Wetland
Located in
Dense
Urban Area
Near a
Body of
Water,
Aquifer,
Social
Disruption
Potential
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
1965
Install
Year
Under a
Strucutre
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
Dia.
(in)
UnderBody
of Water
655.9
482.8
596.0
674.2
675.9
617.6
517.6
429.5
589.8
675.6
646.3
379.2
389.0
371.9
623.1
413.5
531.8
603.9
408.7
627.9
739.7
454.3
290.7
603.3
702.3
673.5
522.2
736.0
496.7
767.5
408.9
Length
(ft)
Diameter
0023S0434:0023S0085
0023S0085:0023S0097
0023S0097:0023S0170
0023S0170:0023S0270
0023S0270:0023S0271
0023S0271:0023S0248
0023S0248:0008S0026
0008S0026:0008S0030
0008S0030:0008S0034
0008S0034:0008S0040
0008S0040:0007S0178
0007S0178:0007S0174
0007S0174:0007S0167
0007S0167:0007S0156
0007S0156:0007S0042
0007S0042:0007S0471
0007S0471:0007S0067
0007S0067:0007S0064
0007S0064:0007S0063
0007S0063:0007S0060
0007S0060:0007S0058
0007S0058:0020S0042
0020S0042:0020S0041
0020S0041:0020S0034
0020S0034:0020S0028
0020S0028:0019S0018
0019S0018:0019S0012
0019S0012:0019S0011
0019S0011:0019S0005
0019S0005:0019S0002
0019S0002:0040S0344
Segment ID
SocialPolitical
Sum
Consequence of Failure Factors
Total
Consequen
ce of
Failure
Costs
Accessibilit
y
Future Decay Factor
Scioto Main
Current Condition Score
West Side Relief
General Asset Information
4/27/2020
Unfavorable
Publicity
AECOM
16
19
21
21
25
25
25
23
23
23
23
23
23
24
23
24
23
21
21
21
19
8
7
20
7
7
22
24
23
24
23
23
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
21
19
19
7
18
7
7
23
23
24
23
25
23
23
23
Notes:
1. Pipe segment designated 0007S0013:0007S0018 consists of 36″ diameter pipe which changes abruptlly to 78″ diameter without a structure at the change in diameter. For this reason that pipe segment is
split in this table. It is recommended that a manhole be installed at the point of change in diameter and a that maintenance shaft replace MH 0007S0018 due to heavy sediment build up at this location. This
C:Userscloudconvertserverfiles1201182669db79c-4fc7-4a35-81d9-349743b5185520200427000144cee_733_833_spring_2020_term_design_project_data
1 of 1
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM DESIGN PROJECT ASSIGNMENT
OVERVIEW:
Each group will design a Public Infrastructure Asset Management (AM) Plan for the assessment
provided by Brown and Caldwells Cincinnati, OH office. As much information as possible from your client
(Malley) will be posted on Canvas. References and sample PIAM plans that should assist in this PIAM
Design Project have also been provided on Canvas throughout the semester.
SECTION I: PROJECT BACKGROUND
This condition assessment study is concerned with two large diameter sewer systems on the southwest
side of Columbus, Ohio; the Scioto Main Trunk Sewer (SMTS) and the West Side Relief Sewer (WSRS).
These sewer runs are portions of the Scioto Main Trunk Sewer South (SMTSS) and the West Side Relief
Sewer as designated in the Wet Weather Management Plan (WWMP). The WWMP is the Citys capital
improvement plan which was created to comply with Consent Orders (CO) the City entered into with the
State of Ohio to address wet weather overflows. Both sewer systems addressed by this report influence
a Designed Sewer Relief (DSR) overflow point which may need to be addressed per the CO.
Proprietary and Confidential Client Work Product not for distribution outside of CEE 733/833
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
Figure 1: Project Location
The objective of this study is to evaluate the condition of these two large diameter assets and to provide
recommendations for rehabilitation and or replacement of certain segments or the entire length of the
sewer. Recommendations should be based on analysis methods that employ Consequence of Failure
(CoF) and Risk of Failure (RoF) concepts to determine the most cost effective means of addressing
critical structural deficiencies that exist today and renewing the infrastructure to maintain its overall
condition in a good state of repair. A complete description of the required scope of services can be found
in Section IV of this report.
Proprietary and Confidential Client Work Product not for distribution outside of CEE 733/833
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
SECTION II: SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
SCIOTO MAIN
The SMTS is approximately 17,500 feet of 90-inch-diameter reinforced concrete pipe built in 1965. The
SMTS runs in easements or within road rights-of-way.
The surface land use includes industrial,
commercial, residential, wooded and cemetery areas. The sewer crosses arterial roads, secondary roads
and interstate I-70. The depths of sewer range from 10.85 feet (at MH 0020S0034) to 25.90 feet (at MH
0007S0058) and have an average depth of approximately 17 feet. There are 31 manholes unique to the
SMTS. A plan view of these sewers is shown in Figure 2-1. The alignment is described in alphanumeric
order by upstream manhole in Table 2-1.
Alignment and Manhole Description
The SMTS is in the Jackson Pike tributary area and ends approximately 1.3 miles upstream from the
Jackson Pike Wastewater Treatment Plant (JPWWTP) at junction chamber 0040S0034. The project
limits are upstream from MH 0023S0434, near the entrance to Rhodes Park on West Broad Street, and
downstream to MH 0040S0344, west of I-71, where the SMTS, the WSRS and the West Side Sanitary
Sewer meet.
Manholes range in depth from 10.85 feet to 25.90 feet; the average depth is approximately 17 feet. Nine
(9) manholes are located where traffic control is required for access. The manhole lids in the wooded
area adjacent to Greenlawn Cemetery are welded to their frames, to deter theft.
WEST SIDE RELIEF
Alignment and Manhole Description
The WSRS in its entirety extends from MH 0044S0509 at the intersection of Highland Avenue and Mound
Street to MH 0019S0004 located south of Emig Road. This report addresses the section of the WSRS
from MH 0045S0005 just east of the intersection of Butler Avenue and Mound Street to where the WSRS
connects to the SMTS at MH 0040S0344. This portion is approximately 14,500 feet of 36-inch to 78-inchdiameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with vitrified clay liner plates on the bottom half.
The project extents for the WSRS condition assessment begin immediately downstream of the Early Ditch
Infiltration/Inflow (I/I) Elimination project at MH 0045S0005 in Mound Street. The WSRS extends to
junction chamber 004S0344 where the SMTS, the WSRS and the West Side Sanitary Sewer meet.
The WSRS sewer runs in easements or within road rights-of-way.
The surface land use includes
industrial, commercial, residential, wooded and cemetery areas. The sewer crosses arterial roads and
secondary roads. The depths of sewer range from 9.2 feet (at MH 0022S0353) to 27.50 feet (at MH
0007S0018) and have an average depth of approximately 17.5 feet. There are 37 manholes unique to
Proprietary and Confidential Client Work Product not for distribution outside of CEE 733/833
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
Figure 2-1: Scioto Main Alignment
WSRS. A plan view of the sewer is shown in Figure 2-2.
Proprietary and Confidential Client Work Product not for distribution outside of CEE 733/833
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
Figure 2-2: West Side Relief Alignment
Proprietary and Confidential Client Work Product not for distribution outside of CEE 733/833
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
CONDITION ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The condition of the SMTS and WSRS was determined by a combination of sonar, CCTV, and visual
manhole inspections. The sonar inspections were performed where flows were of a sufficient depth for
the sonar apparatus and were used to determine the pipe condition and extent of sediment deposition
below the water level. CCTV inspections were performed on each segment in the project extents to
determine the condition of each pipe segment above the water level. Where sonar inspections were not
able to be performed and where pipe diameters were large enough for man-entry, sediment levels were
recorded manually. Defects identified through sonar and CCTV inspections were coded and logged into
an inspection form in accordance with the National Association of Sewer Service Companies
(NASSCOs) Pipeline Assessment and Certification Program (PACP) methodology. Manhole inspections
were performed for each accessible manhole. Data was collected with a CCTV camera suspended and
lowered into the manhole. The data collection followed protocol that combined City of Columbus (COC)
manhole inspection required data and NASSCOs Manhole Assessment and Certification Program
(MACP). The data was presented on COC and MACP forms.
Proprietary and Confidential Client Work Product not for distribution outside of CEE 733/833
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
SECTION III: AVAILABLE DATA
The design engineer is being provided the following available data from the City in the attached Excel
spreadsheet:

General Asset Information:
o
Segment ID: Unique alpha-numeric designation for each segment of the pipe
infrastructure. The name is comprised of the unique ID for the upstream and
downstream manholes, separated by a colon.

o
Length: Length of the pipe segment
o
Diameter: Internal diameter of the pipe segment
o
Install Year: Year the pipe was constructed
o
MOC: Material of construction
Current Condition Score:
o
Structural: PACP pipe segment score for structural defects
o
Service: PACP pipe segment score for service defects
o
O&M: PACP pipe segment score for O&M defects
Future Decay Factors
The Citys relative score (per pipe segment, scale of 1-5) for factors that could influence future
degradation of the asset. Scores above zero indicate these factors could cause a given pipe
segment to degrade at a faster rate than adjacent assets with lower factors
o
Residential/Street Parking Lot: Pipe travels underneath a residential street or parking lot.
Lowest degree of surface loading. Lowest consequence of failure.
o
Arterial Road / Large Vehicle Traffic: Pipe travels underneath an arterial road and may
experience heavier traffic loading from busses and trucks that do not typically travel on
residential streets. Intermediate consequence of failure
o
Highway: Highest degree of traffic loading, higher consequence of failure
o
Railroad: Highest loading of non-vehicular traffic, higher consequence of failure
Proprietary and Confidential Client Work Product not for distribution outside of CEE 733/833
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
o
SO Frequency: Frequency the sewer experiences surcharge during wet weather events,
and external forces pushing out from the inside of the pipe
o

Replacement Cost
o

O&M: PACP pipe segment score for O&M defects
Unit Cost ($/LF): Estimated replacement cost for replacing the pipe with in-kind materials
Consequence of Failure Factors
The Citys relative score (per pipe segment, scale of 1-5) for factors that lead to different
consequences of failure for a given pipe segment. Scores are broken into economic and sociopolitical factors.
Proprietary and Confidential Client Work Product not for distribution outside of CEE 733/833
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
SECTION IV: SCOPE OF SERVICES
Using the available data, the design engineer shall:
1. Estimate the remaining useful life of the assets, based on the date of installation and the
expected useful life of 120 years.
2. Determine an approach for using the condition scores and to determine the Probability of Failure
(PoF) for each pipe segment based on its current condition score.
3. Determine an approach for using the Consequence of Failure (CoF) factors for each pipe
segment based on current assessment of CoF factors.
4. Estimate the criticality of the pipe segments using the concept that PoF x CoF = Criticality (RoF)
5. Estimate the Citys current financial risk associated with the criticality scores and the known pipe
replacement costs.
6. Estimate the Citys future financial risk (2027) if the City elects to delay repairs due to other funding
priorities
a.
Use Future Decay Factors to develop a methodology to adjust the condition score to reflect a
future PoF
b.
Re-calculate the Criticality Score (RoF) and replacement costs to determine the future financial
risk
7. Develop a summary report that includes:
a.
Project background and understanding
b.
Methodology for estimating PoF, CoF, and Criticality (RoF)
c.
Methodology for evaluating risk cost for replacement (current and future)
d.
Summary of findings
Proprietary and Confidential Client Work Product not for distribution outside of CEE 733/833
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
Proprietary and Confidential Client Work Product not for distribution outside of CEE 733/833
CEE 733/833
2020 PIAM Design Project Assignment
CEE 733/833 PIAM DESIGN PROJECT
ORAL PRESENTATION RUBRIC
The Term Project design oral presentations will be in class on April 27, 29, May 1
and May 4, 2020. The presentations will mimic a typical technical design interview (no
general audience type questions). Each design team will have 15 minutes (timed) to
present their IAM design to an audience consisting of their competitors and the client
(Malley). Each group member is expected to speak during the presentation and will be
held responsible to answer questions on the project. Immediately following each
presentation there will be up to 5 minutes of questions where the client will ask a broad
range of questions on all aspects of the project.
The presenters and the audie…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Ask for Instant Assignment Writing Help. No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Online assignment writing service website that provide students with original and unique academic essays, research proposals, research papers, term papers, movie reviews, Book reviews, scholarship essays, personal statements, projects, presentations, dissertation, theses, admission essays, annotated bibliographies, reports, application papers, among others.

Ask for Instant Assignment Writing Help. No Plagiarism Guarantee!

Stuck on a homework question? Our verified assignment writers can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!